Conseil constitutionnel : Comment les Sages ont choisi « l’apaisement et la stabilité » selon Ndiaga Sylla
Reacting to the Constitutional Council's decision regarding the appeal against the presidency of the National Assembly, electoral expert Ndiaga Sylla believes that the High Court could hardly intervene in a matter that he considers to be extra-electoral.
According to him, the referral filed by members of parliament after the deadline reflects uncertainty regarding the appropriate procedure to follow. He also emphasizes that the proposed constitutional amendment concerning the establishment of a Constitutional Court demonstrates the need to overcome the persistent and justified incompetence of the High Court.
While acknowledging that a more thorough legal clarification would have been desirable, Ndiaga Sylla believes the Council members chose to prioritize "calm and stability in the country." He does, however, point out that the matter was not referred to the court through the channels he deems appropriate, neither by the President of the Republic nor by the members of Parliament within the required timeframe.
Ultimately, the electoral expert believes that the ruling does not truly resolve the fundamental debate. "The verdict results in a draw," he concludes, suggesting that the legal and political questions remain entirely unanswered despite the Constitutional Council's decision.
Commentaires (47)
Participer à la Discussion
Règles de la communauté
💡 Astuce : Utilisez des emojis depuis votre téléphone ou le module emoji ci-dessous. Cliquez sur GIF pour ajouter un GIF animé. Collez un lien X/Twitter, TikTok ou Instagram pour l'afficher automatiquement.
Se connecter
Commentez avec votre profil, votre photo, et soyez averti des réponses.