Lansana Gagny Sakho recadre Habibou Dia et Pape Alé Niang : "il y une méconnaissance profonde du cadre juridique qui régit la RTS"
For the Chairman of the Board of Directors of APIX and President of the Circle of Public Administrators, the Ministry of Communication, through its Director of Communication Habibou Dia, is mistaken in its intention to interfere in the internal management of RTS. According to Lansana Gagny Sakho, only the board of directors of the national television station is authorized to make decisions concerning company agreements.
"The attitude expressed by the ministry in this matter reveals above all a profound misunderstanding of the legal framework governing RTS and, more broadly, entities in the semi-public sector. It is essential to reiterate that the technical supervisory authority has no jurisdiction whatsoever to intervene in the internal management of RTS or to rule on the validity or scope of an establishment agreement. The law is clear: Establishment agreements fall exclusively under the purview of the Board of Directors, the only body authorized to adopt them, amend them, or, where applicable, suspend their implementation. No external authority, even a ministerial one, can replace this internal governance established by law," writes Lansana Gagny Sakho.
The Chairman of the Board of Directors of APIX reacts after the controversy sparked by the Director of Communication at the Ministry of Communication, Telecommunications and Digital Affairs, Habibou Dia, who had stated that RTS employees would demand "more than one billion per month".
These remarks provoked the ire of the inter-union group SYNPAP–SYNPICS, which spoke of falsehoods and demanded a public apology from Habibou Dia.
In his post, Lansana Gagny Sakho also criticized Pape Alé Niang, who suspended the company agreement for employees of the national television station. "The RTS Director General's actions constitute a clear violation of Law 2022-08, which strictly regulates the governance, responsibilities, and scope of action of the leaders of public entities. This law was specifically designed to prevent interference, guarantee transparency, and ensure that each body exercises its prerogatives in accordance with the rules. Behind this situation, a simple question arises: Do they truly understand the mission entrusted to them and the legal framework within which it must be carried out? Given the facts, the answer is clearly no," Gagny Sakho analyzes.
Commentaires (9)
Participer à la Discussion
Règles de la communauté
💡 Astuce : Utilisez des emojis depuis votre téléphone ou le module emoji ci-dessous. Cliquez sur GIF pour ajouter un GIF animé. Collez un lien X/Twitter, TikTok ou Instagram pour l'afficher automatiquement.
Se connecter
Commentez avec votre profil, votre photo, et soyez averti des réponses.